Shir Hashirim is the most erotic and sensual book to enter our canon.
I used to get really upset when I heard it explained as an allegory. I felt it was diminishing the power the book had as magnificent erotic poetry; that somehow the sexuality and sensuality of the book wasn’t okay and had to be explained away. I still feel that way sometimes, but more recently it occurred to me that when chazal called Shir Hashirim an allegory of our experience of G-d, they are really saying, at least on some level, that the power and passion of the sexual relationship can be so intense and so all encompassing that it is the best analogy we can use for an understanding of what our relationship to G-d should look like.
I’d like to address Shir Hashirim from a much more literal approach – as a love poem between a young man and a young woman— and to challenge a modern notion we have about sex.
Our society is in love with words and verbal communication. So much so, that we have come to believe that real emotions live in what is spoken; that relationships of the mind and heart are somehow purer then relationships of the body. And often we believe the equation to be one way, and one way only: if you have close meaningful communication – the experts say- that will lead to passion. If you talk with someone, communicate with someone and create intimacy with them through words, then your love life will take care of itself. Well, sometimes that’s true and sometimes it isn’t, but what I think seems to get lost in the shuffle, is the power of the reverse. When your sexual life is good, I would say, when it’s passionate and intense – then more often than not, it brings you to a sense of closeness and intimacy. The deeply erotic can forge two people, creating a connection that is stronger and less permeable than words alone could ever accomplish. The physical connection can make one feel a connection to a person beyond that of a friend. The power and the intensity of physical expressions of love can deeply impact a relationship, taking it to new places – places of understanding, commitment, joy – and bind them together.
And maybe Shir Hashirim understood this in its unabashed celebration of the physical and the erotic. Perhaps in glorifying the pure beauty and pleasure of the physical relationship with a loved one, Shir Hashirim suggests that a physical relationship can move two people beyond the ordinary day to day and into the realm of loved and beloved.
And maybe chazal understood that as well when they were so committed to seeing Shir Hashirim as an allegory. For in the end, our relationships are all dependent, one on another. It is through our relationships with each other that we can get a glimpse of what loving G-d should be all about. In understanding the power of the erotic relationship between human beings we can come to understand the experience we should have with G-d; – the awe, worship, adoration and dedication that one lover feels for another—that, in the end, should be what we feel towards G-d.






















I have taught Shir HaShirim from the perspective that if every thing glorious comes from G-d, then sexuality and the opportunity to experience a passionate physical relationship is one of those things as well. Certainly Chazal understood this and insisted on the importance of the sexual relationship within marriage. This erotic relationship is especially important for the male partner. It is through the physical act that they show intimacy and connection. While women might be told that during Nidah , they might be able to connect with their husband on a deep level, that unfortunately is just not the case. Men and I think many women as well feel the closest during the physical relationship.
Comment by Marianne Novak on April 14, 2011 11:45 PM
Thank you for writing this courageous and beautiful piece!
Comment by Jen on April 15, 2011 12:20 AM
I enjoyed reading your article.
However I believe chazal missed the main point of Shir Hashirim. The celebration of life begins with the erotic love between man and woman which lead to the tastiest fruits – children and long lasting love. You are right – love and intimacy certainly goes both ways. I truly believe that one cannot reach the optimal heightened bond with their partner if their physical love-making is lacking or not practiced regularly. Another main point I beleive is often overlooked in the text is how the author describes the physical beauty of his lover. Meaning that the partners must be appealing to each other and have the right chemilstry. For this to happen both have to be physically and emotionally healthty which leads to being sexy. When both partners are fufilled sexually the relationship usually grows – shalom bayit and bayit neeman develops and both will grow closer to hakodosh baruch hu.
Perhaps some of the Chazal were trying to encourage one of the most importmant lessons in life – less study in the Bet Medrash and more physical time with their wives.
This is spiritual!
Whenever I look at my beautiful children I feel a deep connection to Hashem and feel a twinkle in my eye reminding always of my passion and love for my beautiful wife.
Rabbi Gavriael Moskowitz – Rabbi of the Wellness Synagogue – Kehilla Nefesh Breeyah
and authoring book – Nefesh Breeyah – Pairush al Hatorah
917-916-4681
Comment by Rabbi Gary Moskowitz on April 15, 2011 10:39 AM
תישר כחך , Dr. Marcus, for offering what deserves to become the classic introduction to all serious study of this paean.
Finally, you have dared to lift the veil behind which awaits the repressed ultimate song.
Enjoy this lovely day, a שלום ומבורך שבת, a relaxing and pleasant weekend and a חג פסח שמח.
Warmly
Moishe
Comment by Moishe (Thomas) Goldstein on April 15, 2011 2:39 PM
Great perspective! As we know, “shivim panim la’Torah” – there are 70 interpretations for each piece of Tanach. While the alagorical interpretation is important, you have offered a truly unique perspective that’s been staring us in the face for generations. Tizki Le’mitzvot.
Comment by Allon Franklin on April 17, 2011 3:49 AM